Hong Kong and Singapore have long engaged in healthy competition as the dominant midshore financial centres serving as the global gateway to Asia.
Since 2010, when Vistra began its jurisdiction rankings – where corporate services respondents rate the importance of global financial centres – Hong Kong has been the more dominant of the two. In this year’s research, Singapore rose to top spot in the rankings alongside the UK and the US, while Hong Kong has fallen into fourth place.
It is a marginal advantage: 46% of our respondents rated Singapore as a highly important financial centre for their organisation, versus 43% that said the same about Hong Kong. But it is the reversal of fortunes between these close rivals that is important in understanding the future trajectory of each.
How the tables turned
The current political turmoil afflicting Hong Kong may be helping Singapore to gain traction with Asia’s wealthy, based on Vistra’s latest rankings:
“People are rethinking their exposure to Hong Kong, and Singapore has become massively important over the last 12 months,” says a partner at a Hong Kong-based law firm. “It’s an island of calm in very turbulent waters,” says a UK-based private wealth lawyer.
Singapore’s ascent should not be wholly attributed to the recent turbulence, however. The city-state’s government deserves credit, too.
Singapore has been proactive in increasing its attractiveness for activities such as fund management and wealth planning.
In 2018, Singapore introduced a new investment fund structure, the Variable Capital Company (VCC), to increase its attractiveness as a domicile for alternative funds.
The VCC offers more flexibility to investors, operational cost savings and tax advantages, positioning it to challenge leading fund domiciles such as the Cayman Islands.
Singapore has been trying to attract a greater share of Asia’s growing high net worth clients in recent years, too. Its trust laws offer confidentiality to settlors and beneficiaries, as well as tax exemptions.
“A lot of trust companies are opening up in Singapore now. The international ones too – the ones we're used to seeing in Jersey – which we perhaps didn’t see there a few years ago,” says the UK-based private wealth lawyer.
Hong Kong bruised but not broken
It would be premature to write off Hong Kong as a preferred global hub – and certainly not as the preferred destination for China outbound.
Ties between China’s wealthy and Hong Kong are deeply embedded. More than half of Hong Kong’s estimated private wealth of over US$1 trillion is thought to be from mainland individuals . And, as political uncertainty has heightened during 2020, mainland Chinese money flowing into Hong Kong stocks has increased: US$35.3 billion of Hong Kong-listed shares were acquired up to the end of May, beating the same period in 2018 and 2017 .
Unlike Hong Kong, Singapore is not integrated into China’s economic system and it cannot boast the same level of convenience for Chinese clients seeking to move money abroad. “While I think the recent disruption may have made Hong Kong slightly more unfavourable, it’s nowhere near as much as I expected,” says a tax consultant in the Hong Kong office of an international law firm. “We're still getting the same sort of inquiries and the same sort of work as before.”
Singapore has not yet been able to build the same level of trust with Chinese clients as Hong Kong either, according to the tax consultant. “Mainlanders are more attuned to dealing with people in Hong Kong and they’re more comfortable with the court system here,” he says.
Hong Kong also stands to gain from the EU’s introduction of economic substance rules, which target the Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories. “If a client doesn’t fall into one of the exemptions, then they’re more likely to move an entity to midshore or onshore,” says a Shanghai-based lawyer, who advises entrepreneurs and wealthy families. “Hong Kong would be higher up on the list than Singapore.”
Furthermore, in March this year, Hong Kong introduced a bill for a Limited Partnership Fund regime, establishing a vehicle designed specifically for the needs of private equity funds. Its government is also considering potential tax concessions in respect of carried interest for private equity funds.
Global perceptions of Hong Kong have undoubtedly been altered and it must now adapt to a new reality, but as the gateway to China and a longstanding global financial centre, it will retain an important role internationally.
Find out more about Vistra 2030 and download the report here
 China's rich skirting Hong Kong to seek asset safety elsewhere, Reuters, May 2020
 Chinese investors are buying Hong Kong stocks like never before, The Straits Times, May 2020
The contents of this article are intended for informational purposes only. The article should not be relied on as legal or other professional advice. Neither Vistra Group Holding S.A. nor any of its group companies, subsidiaries or affiliates accept responsibility for any loss occasioned by actions taken or refrained from as a result of reading or otherwise consuming this article. For details, read our Legal and Regulatory notice at: http://www.vistra.com/notices . Copyright © 2022 by Vistra Group Holdings SA. All Rights Reserved.
Future-proofing operations: Alternative investment funds must accelerate transformation projects post-Covid-19
17 Mar 2021
Scott Kraemer, Managing Director of Alternative Investments for Vistra in North America, outlines some emerging trends in the industry and explains why operational transformation and digital innovation will be central to funds’ success over the coming…
How Middle Eastern families’ corporate services needs are shifting
10 Mar 2021
Missing the mark? Why the future of beneficial ownership rules hangs in the balance
02 Mar 2021
Vistra 2030: Unlocking Opportunity for the Decade Ahead
14 Oct 2020
Counting on convergence: Why regulatory cooperation may not have peaked
07 Oct 2020
The big questions for the corporate services industry post-Covid-19
29 Jul 2020