A wave of tax, transparency and economic substance regulation has transformed the corporate services industry over the last decade, subjecting global financial centres to increasingly more robust rules.
After the global financial crisis (GFC), the interests of the US and the EU aligned to drive greater transparency into private and corporate clients’ financial activity, and to address a perceived tax gap.
The OECD found a willing audience among members and non-members alike for initiatives such as the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan and the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), which made the world a much smaller place when it came to fighting aggressive tax avoidance and enabling information exchange. Meanwhile, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) had success in galvanising governments worldwide to strengthen anti-money laundering regulations.
Signs of a slowdown
Running in parallel with this regulatory progress, Vistra’s decade of research into the corporate services industry had shown expectations of regulatory convergence rise year on year — until 2020. For instance, in our 2018 study, 76 percent of respondents expected to see full implementation of CRS across OECD members by 2025, while this year, only 55 percent had the same expectation. And while 67 percent thought we were heading for global adoption of central beneficial ownership registries when surveyed in 2018, just 50 percent are expecting this today.
It is clear that we are in different times now. No one is certain that, in the teeth of the worst global pandemic in more than a century, developments on all these issues will continue at the same pace.
Many of the governments that eagerly pressed ahead with increased international cooperation may be bound to look at the deterioration of their economies during 2020 and consider whether further cooperation should take a backseat for now.
And, while Covid-19 is perhaps the dominant factor giving rise to this view, it is not the only driver. The US-China trade war, the detached relationship between the US and Europe, Brexit and the debate between EU member states as they try to adopt common responses to economic conditions, have also contributed to what some see as a diminishing resolve for international alignment.
Differences of opinion over what form international cooperation should take in areas such as information sharing, beneficial ownership registries and corporate tax rules are another reason why governments may want to slow the pace of change.
For example, the US has not signed up to the CRS and a possible change of president in November 2020 is unlikely to change that. And neither the US nor Asia seem likely to replicate the EU’s legislation on what it deems to be non-cooperative tax jurisdictions.
National interest is creating friction in some BEPS discussions, too. The taxation of the digital economy is a particular sticking point between the US and Europe, where the US feels that proposed new rules would unfairly harm the interests of its technology companies.
On economic substance, the EU has deemed the Cayman Islands, a British overseas territory, to have fallen foul of its rules. The blacklist is up for review again in October 2020.
More to unite than divide
In the majority of these cases, however, the points of friction that tend to attract most attention represent just a small part of a bigger picture, which is one of shared underlying interests.
Underpinning both CRS and FATCA was a shared ambition by Europe and the US to strengthen transparency standards and rebuild trust between the public and the banking and professional services industries. Corporate services firms and their clients may prefer to see a unified standard in the long term.
Meanwhile, issues such as the taxation of the digital economy may simply prove too important for the international community to risk halting all progress.
And in Europe, though Brexit discussions continue, the UK’s interests will usually be best served by aligning with future EU legislation in areas such as anti-money laundering and financial access.
The Covid-19 pandemic may also create renewed momentum for further scrutiny of offshore business among major developed economies. As we saw in the wake of the GFC, this agenda tends to increase in prominence when governments feel under urgent pressure to raise their revenues.
So, while the path of regulatory cooperation never runs smooth, and is perhaps in for a rougher ride in the short-term due to economic strife and political pressures, the balance of interests will almost certainly err towards greater alignment.
Find out more about Vistra 2030 and download the report here
The contents of this article are intended for informational purposes only. The article should not be relied on as legal or other professional advice. Neither Vistra Group Holding S.A. nor any of its group companies, subsidiaries or affiliates accept responsibility for any loss occasioned by actions taken or refrained from as a result of reading or otherwise consuming this article. For details, read our Legal and Regulatory notice at: http://www.vistra.com/notices . Copyright © 2024 by Vistra Group Holdings SA. All Rights Reserved.
The big questions for the corporate services industry post-Covid-19
29 Jul 2020
Vistra’s latest industry study finds that corporate services professionals are torn over some big questions as the world looks to recover from the economic shock arising from the Covid-19 pandemic: What are the key risks and opportunities? How will…
Revisiting industry predictions: Were Vistra 2020’s forecasts on the money or off the mark?
05 Jun 2020
‘Vistra 2020’ — Charting a decade that transformed corporate services
11 May 2020